CiteFuel vs AthenaHQ: Subscription Scoring vs Fixed-Price Fix Files
| Feature | AthenaHQ | CiteFuel |
|---|---|---|
| AI visibility scoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Content optimization suggestions | ✓ | ✓ (+ the files themselves) |
| llms.txt generation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Fix file output | ✗ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | From ~$95/mo self-serve; enterprise custom | $799 one-time or $49/mo |
| One-time engagement option | ✗ (subscription) | ✓ |
| White-label for agencies | — | ✓ ($999 + $199/report) |
Competitor details verified June 2026 from public pricing pages and market research; vendors change plans — check their site for current terms. Spot an error? Tell us and we'll correct it.
AthenaHQ occupies the mid-market GEO monitoring space with a capable AI visibility scoring product and industry-specific coverage. For teams that want an always-on dashboard and continuous prompt tracking, it functions well as a monitoring layer at a fair self-serve price.
The structural difference is the engagement model: a monitoring subscription accumulates cost month after month, while the output remains diagnostic — you see scores and gaps, but the action is still yours to take. For most growth-stage teams, the implementation gap between "your citability score is 34" and "here is the rewritten passage" is where momentum dies.
CiteFuel's model is the inverse: one fixed-price audit with the fix files in the deliverable. For teams that need ongoing monitoring after the initial fix, our $49/mo plan adds automated re-scanning without a platform commitment.
Get your fix files — fixed price, 48-hour delivery →
More comparisons: vs Profound · vs Otterly.ai · vs HubSpot AEO Grader · vs Semrush AI Toolkit